Blue angel eyes on ebay

[JonsMazda]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/MAZDA3-MAZDA-3-BLUE-CCFL-ANGEL-EYE-KIT_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ36476QQihZ008QQitem Z180160600233QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWDVW

[Jeff-TheBiz]

drool....



THE ITEMS COME EXTRACT THE SAME AS THE PICTURES

Good to know, that they are extractly as they look...

[S.F.W.]

those are hawt.

[yearoftherat]

and prb illegal too

[S.F.W.]

and prb illegal too
minor details :)

[lamerking]

and prb illegal too

Because their blue?

[Unoriginalusername]

they look nice

[FLIPDADY]

Jon just give me the $100 for the ticket that you're probably gonna get for having those.:chuckle

[McGuyver_3]

when the cop looks switch on the white ones when he turns his bnack turn on the blue ones LOL That would be a wicked idea lol

[Cardinal Fang]

I've seen red angel eyes and now blue. I love idea but as YOTR mentioned, it's illegal. Depends how much you're willing to risk.

[condor888000]

Really, angel eyes themselves are fairly rare, no need for blue IMO. Too risky.

[dentinger]

cops around here dont really care about stuff like that.
like, my friend drives a jetta, and he has blue underglow on, and literally blue headlights (not 8,000k, i mean literally blue light). and he's driven past cops before, behind cops, and infront of cops, and he hasnt gotten booked once.... and its been a good month with the HID's, and a good 2 months with the underglow.
my reasoning is that if you fight the ticket, the cop doenst want to show up in court to fight a stupid $100 ticket, so they dont even bother.

[chinsterr]

haha Sam (from formula one imports at pacific mall) showed me red/blue/green angel eyes a year ago .

But this is the first time seeing them on ebay.

lol Jon, don't even think about it dude

[JonsMazda]

haha Sam (from formula one imports at pacific mall) showed me red/blue/green angel eyes a year ago .

But this is the first time seeing them on ebay.

lol Jon, don't even think about it dude

Nah, not thinking about installing them. Im happy with my white angel eyes. :)

[Skarbro]

EDIT: Found the section that basically says you can't have any lights that are not amber or white in the front in the evening/night. See my post below:

http://www.torontomazda3.ca/forum/showthread.php?p=223860#post223860

---original post---

I can't find anything in the Ontario HTA that says that it's illegal to have blue lights as long as they aren't flashing or accompanied with red lights.



Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) (http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90h08_f.htm#s62s14p1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry any lamp that casts red and blue lights to the front. 2007, c. 13, s. 17 (2).
Red light in front
(15) (http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90h08_f.htm#s62s15) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a vehicle described in subsection (15.1) may carry lamps that cast a red light only or such other colour of light that may, with the approval of the ministry, be designated by a by-law of the municipality in which the vehicle is operated, but no other motor vehicle shall carry any lamp that casts a red light to the front. 1998, c. 35, s. 103.


Flashing blue light on snow-removal equipment
(31) (http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90h08_f.htm#s62s31) No person shall, while operating a road service vehicle on a highway, plow, salt or de-ice the highway or apply chemicals or abrasives to the highway for snow or ice control unless the road service vehicle is equipped with a lamp producing intermittent flashes of blue light visible for a distance of 150 metres from all directions. 1996, c. 33, s. 11.
Restriction on use of flashing blue light
(32) (http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90h08_f.htm#s62s32) No person shall operate a lamp that produces intermittent flashes of blue light on a highway except,
(a) a person operating a road service vehicle in the circumstances described in subsection (31); or
(b) a person operating a police department vehicle, together with a lamp that produces intermittent flashes of red light, as permitted by subsection (14.1). 2007, c. 13, s. 17 (8).

[Aitch]

^^ Actually the very first part you quoted restricts blue lights on the front to Police vehicles! Regardless of having flashing red lights or not.

[Skarbro]

^^ Actually the very first part you quoted restricts blue lights on the front to Police vehicles! Regardless of having flashing red lights or not.
No it doesn't. It says "red and blue lights", not "red or blue lights". Read the other parts to see how they are worded. If they mean "or" then this part is inconsistent and written incorrectly.

[JPAV8S4U]

No it doesn't. It says "red and blue lights", not "red or blue lights". Read the other parts to see how they are worded. If they mean "or" then this part is inconsistent and written incorrectly.

Agreed with Skarboro on this one... it totally wouldnt hold up in court ;) Now get them blue angel eyes on! They look hawt!

[SP33D 3]

yea get them and sell me your white ones :)

[Aitch]

Ah, technicalities pwnz. However I think it would be a 50/50 crapshoot in court, because although technically you are right that the law allows blue lights if no red lights are present, the crown would probably argue that the 'spirit of the law' is that blue lights by themselves help indicate a police/emergency vehicle - which in itself is what the law is supposed to prevent.

[Skarbro]

Ah, technicalities pwnz. However I think it would be a 50/50 crapshoot in court, because although technically you are right that the law allows blue lights if no red lights are present, the crown would probably argue that the 'spirit of the law' is that blue lights by themselves help indicate a police/emergency vehicle - which in itself is what the law is supposed to prevent.
No, the Crown can't just overrule the law like that.

[Skarbro]

Anyway, it looks like you can't run blue lights in the front after all. I guess this wording still allows you to run them during the day?



Lamps
Lamps required on all motor vehicles except motorcycles
62. (http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90h08_f.htm#s62s1) (1) (http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/french/elaws_statutes_90h08_f.htm#s62s1) When on a highway at any time from one-half hour before sunset to one-half hour after sunrise and at any other time when, due to insufficient light or unfavourable atmospheric conditions, persons and vehicles on the highway are not clearly discernible at a distance of 150 metres or less, every motor vehicle other than a motorcycle shall carry three lighted lamps in a conspicuous position, one on each side of the front of the vehicle which shall display a white or amber light only, and one on the rear of the vehicle which shall display a red light only. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 62 (1).

[Aitch]

I think the general consensus from those sections combined is that blue lights are still prohibited. Which is why most cops will tell you that when they pull you over. However I would be interested in someone challenging the cop with the wording from Section 14.

[eqlso]

Not really blue angel eyes, but this guy on the mz3 forums has blue LEDs + white angel eyes in his headlights.

Link: http://www.mazda3forums.com/index.php?topic=79987.0