View Full Version : Accessport UBER slow sampling rate
fywdyl
02-14-2011, 08:29 PM
Hi guys,
I've been trying to get some logs done but my sampling rate is really crap. Usually, the logs I look at online are sampling at about 0.15-0.20 sec between each point, but my sampling rates are 0.7-1.0 sec between each point. I've tried reducing the number of items to monitor, but still no dice.
Is there a setting were I can change the sampling rate?
Thanks.
Fobio
02-14-2011, 08:32 PM
what firmware?
fywdyl
02-14-2011, 08:55 PM
The newest one just released today.
Fobio
02-14-2011, 10:18 PM
number of items to monitor AND number of items to log?
fywdyl
02-14-2011, 11:56 PM
5 items to monitor, 15 to log.
That's a lot of items... The more items you have the slower it is (Or rather, the more points it has to check). But you probably knew that already...
Reduce it to one item and you'll see how fast your accessport can really log. Then increase from there... 15 is a lot of items...
fywdyl
02-15-2011, 10:35 AM
Thing is, when I see logs from MSF, they have the same number of items, I'm just trying to log the same things.
But I'll try that and see if it improves, thanks.
fywdyl
02-15-2011, 04:15 PM
OK, so I've done a few tests. I've changed monitoring to just one variable. For logging, I started with one variable. This is what I find.
Num of Var 1 2 3 4
Sec between 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.20
Anything above 4 vars I start to hit 0.50 per data point. How am I suppose to make any useful logs with just 4 vars?
Tokay444
02-15-2011, 05:10 PM
Do more than one log.
taz4432
02-16-2011, 11:21 AM
Do more than one log.
Kind of defeats the purpose since the data would be from different runs/pulls.
MajesticBlueNTO
02-16-2011, 11:50 AM
OK, so I've done a few tests. I've changed monitoring to just one variable. For logging, I started with one variable. This is what I find.
Num of Var 1 2 3 4
Sec between 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.20
Anything above 4 vars I start to hit 0.50 per data point. How am I suppose to make any useful logs with just 4 vars?
what's wrong with 0.5 sec/data point? you're looking for trends moreso than exact point-in-time if you're logging while daily driving. if you're tuning, then you'll limit the data set to what you absolutely need.
the resolution is higher if you log with ATR hooked into the AP i believe so that's another option.
fywdyl
02-16-2011, 12:03 PM
I just don't want to miss boost spikes and stuff. I believe I've figured out the problem, so I'll be limiting the number of items that I'll be logging.
Once ATR is released for Gen2, I will give that a try. Thanks.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.